Hosted by 1PLs (30-day loan)




























 

The Columbus Dispatch
www.dispatch.com

Runoff limits not enforced, groups say

Ohio EPA statistics show 1,100 major construction sites in Franklin County, a lawyer for the groups said.

Friday, October 20, 2000

Ray Crumbley
Dispatch Staff Reporter

Ohio's program to control mud runoff from major construction sites "is broken and needs immediate reform,'' two Franklin County stream- watch groups said yesterday.

"We are calling for an emergency- level response from the Ohio EPA to strengthen this program before the next construction season begins in the spring,'' said Richard Sahli, lawyer for the Friends of Blacklick Creek and the Rocky Fork Creek Watershed Protection Task Force.

Sahli, speaking at a news conference at a home overlooking Rocky Fork Creek, said a surge in residential and commercial development threatens the life in both streams.

Statistics from the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency show 1,100 major construction sites in Franklin County, Sahli said. That's the largest number of any county and about 10 percent of the total.

About 30,000 acres in Franklin County have been stripped of natural vegetation by construction work this year alone.

In a letter sent yesterday to Ohio EPA Director Christopher Jones, the groups call for an increase in staffing at the EPA, a more-effective enforcement approach and a changes in construction-site permits to require specific plans for each site.

The current permit for construction-site management is very general, and no specific site plan is required, Sahli said.

"It could be written on the back of a napkin,'' Sahli said.

"We believe that each site's control plan should be reviewed and approved by the Ohio EPA before construction begins,'' Sahli said.

"We will give the Ohio EPA a chance. If there is no response from the EPA, we will go to Gov. Bob Taft. We are asking for some action.''

EPA spokeswoman Kara Allison replied: "We will be asking for more staffing and funding.''

Volunteers monitor sites and have made some headway since notifying four developers in July that lawsuits might be filed against them under the federal Clean Water Act, said Lou Smith, who heads the 10- year-old Rocky Fork group.

All sites are now in compliance and suits will not be filed. The groups' findings are presented to the EPA, which determines whether violations exist, she said.

"We don't think our volunteers should have to do the legwork,'' Smith said. "This is not how this system should work.''

Among the groups' conclusions:

·  Contractors in central Ohio have been guilty of widespread violations of their Ohio EPA permits designed to prevent runoff of mud into local streams. Volunteers who monitored sites found "a tiny handful of sedimentation basins'' -- the principal safeguard for removing mud.

·  The state program is understaffed. The county is served by a lone Ohio EPA site inspector who has nine other counties to watch.

·  Several local governments have their own construction-site inspection programs, but "We have found them to be uniformly ineffective,'' Sahli said. "Evidently, local governments compete so hard to attract new development that they have a debilitating conflict of interest against forcing these same developers to comply with their responsibilities regarding runoff.''

·  "The state's enforcement effort is pitifully inadequate. It should be obvious that sufficient staffing and ineffective enforcement go hand-in- hand,'' Sahli said.

Certified letters were sent yesterday to two local developers, warning that alleged runoff violations at their sites along Waggoner Road will bring federal court action unless they are corrected within 60 days, said Kurt Keljo, the head of the Blacklick Creek group.

Notices were sent to Matt Callahan, managing agent for Rockford Homes, regarding the Morrison Farms development, and to George Sicaras for the Creekstone development.

They were unavailable for comment.

 

 


Back to Ohio state page


© 2000-2023, www.VoteEnvironment.org