CLEAN AIR AND WATER ARE TOP CONCERNS FOR NORTH CAROLINA
VOTERS
North Carolina voters rank clean water, clean air and over-development
among their top concerns, right on par with education, says
a new environmental poll. The poll also found that environmental
issues figure strongly in voting decisions, and that voters
believe that governmental action is needed to protect the
environment.
A Global Strategy Group, Inc. poll of 600 registered voters
who are likely to vote in the November 2000 election reveals
a strong commitment to environmental protection by voters
in all parts of the state, and across party lines. The
poll was conducted from June 14-18, 2000 for the Conservation
Council of North Carolina Foundation and the League of Conservation
Voters Education Fund.
"The poll shows North Carolina voters are ready to
take action on the environment in the electoral process,
with nearly nine in ten voters characterizing clean air
and water issues as important to their voting decisions,"
said Carrie Oren, Director of the Conservation Council of
North Carolina Foundation. "A large majority of voters
in North Carolina are in favor of a higher level of government
involvement in protecting the environment, and believe that
we can have both a clean environment and a strong economy.
Our elected officials need to understand this as they are
making critical environmental decisions."
Voters demand stronger action from the government. 77%
of voters are in favor of a higher level of government involvement
in protecting the environment. Fewer than one in five NC
voters believe that the government is currently doing enough
or too much to protect the state's environment.
Polluters should fund enforcement efforts. 91% of NC voters
believe that people who break environmental laws should
pay fines for their actions to cover enforcement costs.
89% would have businesses that pollute pay higher dumping
fees to contribute to cleanup efforts.
Voters reject a tradeoff between a clean environment and
a strong economy. 77% of North Carolina voters believe that
a clean environment and strong economy are both attainable
goals.
Now is the time to ask the candidates where they stand:
CLEAN UP NORTH CAROLINA'S
DIRTY AIR!
Under current law, older coal-fired power plants do
not have to follow the same rules as new plants. Would you
favor requiring all coal plants to meet the new environmental
standards for cleaner air?
In addition to power plants, the other significant source
of air pollution comes from automobiles, trucks and sport
utility vehicles. What are your plans to reduce the pollution
from vehicles?
From haze in the mountains to the fumes you breathe during
rush hour traffic, air pollution threatens our health and
the health of our children, our crops, and our natural landscapes.
During the summers of 1998 and 1999, the air was unhealthy
to breathe somewhere in the state one out of every three
days. Cleaning up our power plants and automobiles are
the only way to clean up our air.
The air across North Carolina is becoming unhealthy for
our citizens to breathe. In 1999, NC had the third highest
number of exceedences of health standards for ozone pollution,
second only to California and Texas.
Ozone, the main ingredient of smog, forms when nitrogen
oxide (NOx) emissions from vehicles, power plants, and other
factories are acted upon by sunlight. Ozone hurts crops
and trees, and makes it hard to breathe. Children, the
elderly, people with respiratory ailments, and even healthy
adults (especially when exercising outdoors) can suffer
increased respiratory problems like asthma and permanent
lung damage when ozone levels get too high. In 1997, ozone
problems triggered an estimated 5700 emergency room visits
and 1900 hospital admissions for respiratory problems.
Power plants and automobiles are our two biggest air polluters.
Last year, NC lawmakers passed a law to reduce automobile
pollution, but NC power plants are some of the dirtiest
in the country-- none of the state's 14 coal-fired power
plants are required to meet modern emission standards.
Cleaning up our power plants is the simplest and most cost-effective
way to reduce NC's air pollution and ensure public health.
Industry says this will be too expensive, but the EPA estimates
that the cost of reducing NOx by 80% will cost about $15
per family each year. Current technology is available to
meet these reductions. Our children's health is worth it!
Now is the time to ask candidates and public officials
at all levels – from city councils to the legislature to
Congress -- what they can do to adopt the strongest possible
clean air protections possible.
NO
MORE DIRTY WATER
Do you support the establishment of buffers along all
the rivers of the state to filter out sediment and runoff?
Do you support a cap and reduction on nitrogen
discharges from municipal wastewater treatment plants in
all river basins in our state?
Do you support an accelerated plan to phase out lagoons?
Clean water has captured the attention of the people of
North Carolina. Water that they drink, fish, and swim in,
is too often polluted. The people have realized that as
our state continues to grow and flourish, we must be vigilant
to the increasing threats to water quality.
Many of North Carolina's rivers face problems associated
with excessive nutrients, such as nitrogen and phosphorus,
discharged into the river. There are several sources of
these nutrients and other pollutants that are damaging our
rivers, including municipal and industrial discharges, and
agricultural and other nonpoint run-off. Our rivers fill
with sediment every time it rains.
In 1996, the General Assembly required sources of discharge
into the Neuse River to reduce nitrogen loads by at least
30%. In 1998, the Environmental Management Commission adopted
permanent rules establishing a 50-foot buffer along the
Neuse, as a cost-effective way to reduce pollution. Other
rivers in the state face the same pressures as the Neuse
River and need to be cleaned up to protect fisheries and
drinking water supplies.
The hog industry in North Carolina is a major polluter
in eastern North Carolina. The hog waste lagoons and spray
fields used by large hog farms endanger communities and
water quality. Recent problems caused by the floods from
Hurricane Floyd have highlighted the problems inherent in
the current waste treatment systems -- they leak into groundwater
or contaminate surface waters.
There are many cost-effective and proven steps that can
be taken to reduce water pollution. Will our elected officials
cause them to happen?
WHAT TO DO ABOUT GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT?
Will you support increased funding
for transportation alternatives?
Will you support the establishment of minimum state
criteria for local land use plans?
Building on the lessons of Hurricane Floyd, do you support
restrictions on development in hazardous flood plain areas?
Do you support the Million Acre Initiative, aimed at
protecting and additional million acres of open space by
the year 2010?
North Carolina's booming economy has led to a dramatic
rise in population, with more people moving to our state
every day. While there are many benefits to this growth,
it is important to be aware of the threats to quality of
life that can occur without strong leadership on this issue.
The term "Smart Growth," popular in the media,
encompasses a number of different issue areas, each of which
bears consideration in planning for our future.
Current state policies encourage "sprawl." One
of the top items cited by citizens when asked about problems
associated with rapid growth are traffic and congestion.
Not only does this threaten quality of life, but it is a
serious contributor to air pollution. Transportation alternatives,
such as bus and rail or even carpooling, are under funded,
especially when compared to the state's budget for more
new roads.
Local governments need guidance to develop local
land use plans that protect citizens. In the long run, planning
is the only way to reduce environmental damage and overextended
government infrastructure, such as schools and wastewater
treatment plants, associated with growth.
Widely supported by the public is the protection of natural
areas and green spaces, the environmental legacy we will
leave for our children.
The problems of growth and over-development will not go
away - WHAT OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS DO MATTERS!
|