Clean air and water rate among top concerns
for voters, Pro-Environment Candidates favored by diverse
sets of voters
Analysis from 23 polls debunks common misconceptions
about voter attitudes toward environmental issues
Lisa Wade Raasch, 202-785-8683, #586
Teresa Purcell, 206-898-9271
September 28, 2000
Clean air and water rate among top concerns for voters,
Pro-Environment Candidates favored by diverse sets of voters
Analysis from 23 polls debunks common misconceptions
about voter attitudes toward environmental issues
WASHINGTONContrary to some commonly held assumptions,
environmental issues, specifically clean air and water,
are prominent concerns for voters and their voting decisions.
That was the conclusion from a yearlong public opinion research
project sponsored by the League of Conservation Voters Education
Fund. After completing over 14,600 interviews through 23
polls, leading pollsters debunked common environmental myths,
concluding that clean air and water are salient issues heading
into the November elections.
Historically, the media, elected officials and political
professionals have operated under the misconception that
environmental issues dont influence the choices voters
make on Election Day, said Teresa Purcell, LCVEF senior
projects director, who led the research. After a year
of researching public opinion, its clear that voters
across the country care deeply about clean water and clean
air and will factor these issues into their voting decisions.
At a Washington, D.C. news briefing, LCVEF was joined by
the polling firms of Garin-Hart-Yang, The Tarrance Group,
Beth Schapiro and Associates and Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin
and Associates to debunk five common myths about the environment.
MYTH: Environmental issues (clean air and water)
are not top-tier concerns for voters.
TRUTH: Clean air and water rank as top tier concerns
that are important to voting decisions.
Voters rate clean air and water on par with other top tier
political concerns like education, crime and drugs and health
care, and generally above taxes and Medicare and Social
Security. In addition, in every state polled, a strong majority
of voters responded that clean air, clean water and open
space were important factors in their voting decision. In
all states but one, over 80 percent of voters said that
clean air, clean water and open space are very
or somewhat important to their voting decision,
most notably the New England region (92 percent), New York
and Michigan (91 percent) and Ohio and Wisconsin (90 percent).
Voters continue to be concerned about the environment,
especially clean air and water, said Beth Schapiro,
president of Beth Schapiro and Associates. Voters
rank clean air and water in the top tier with education
and health care.
MYTH: The public thinks that environmental laws
go too far.
TRUTH: Voters overwhelmingly support stricter enforcement
of environmental laws or stronger laws. Very few voters
believe environmental laws should be weakened.
In every state polled, at least 40 percent of voters called
for stronger enforcement of existing laws. States giving
the strongest mandate for stricter enforcement included
Connecticut (63 percent), Ohio and Michigan (60 percent),
and Tennessee, Minnesota and Texas (59 percent). On the
national poll, 53 percent of likely voters called for stricter
enforcement of environmental laws.
Voters know that laws exist to protect them and a
plurality (usually a strong majority) in each of these states
support strong enforcement of existing environmental laws,
said Brian Tringali, partner with The Tarrance Group, a
Republican polling firm.
MYTH: Voters believe we must choose between a clean
environment and a strong economy.
TRUTH: A strong majority of voters overwhelmingly
reject the notion that we must choose between the environment
and the economy. Voters recognize compatibility between
a clean environment and a strong economy, understanding
that the two are not mutually exclusive. In every state
polled, over two-thirds of voters believe we can have both
a clean environment and healthy economy at the same time
without having to choose one over the other. Voters in Alaska
(82 percent), Idaho (80 percent), Minnesota (79 percent),
Tennessee and Connecticut (both at 78 percent) felt most
strongly that a choice does not have to be made.
Voters strongly reject the notion that we must choose
between a strong economy and a clean environment,
said Fred Yang, partner with Garin-Hart-Yang. This
is a false choice for most voters.
MYTH: In a choice between a pro-environment candidate
and a pro-business candidate, the pro-business candidate
always wins.
TRUTH: Votes overwhelmingly prefer a pro-environment
candidate to a candidate who supports less government regulation
on business.
A majority of voters in every state polled except Alaska
are more likely to support pro-environment candidates over
those who would reduce government regulation on business.
In Alaska, a plurality of those polled agreed. Polls on
which over three-quarters of voters support the pro-environment
candidate include: Connecticut, Pennsylvania and Maryland
(82 percent), New York and New England (81 percent), Tennessee
(79 percent), the national poll (78 percent), Wisconsin
(77 percent) and Ohio (76 percent).
Lifestyle issues dominate when we have a strong economy,
Tringali said. The environment is the ultimate lifestyle
issue.
MYTH: Concern about environmental issues is limited
to white collar, well-educated voters.
TRUTH: Clean air and clean water are important to
a vast majority of votersperiod. Young and old, well-educated
and uneducated, white, African-American, and Hispanic, white
collar and blue collarvoters of all socio-economic
backgrounds and of all political stripes are concerned about
the quality of their air and water and prefer candidates
who vow to protect the environment.
Clean water and clean air are seen as critical health
issues to all segments of the American electorate,
said John Fairbank, president of the Democratic polling
firm Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates. Our
research shows that regardless of their age, gender, race,
income or educational attainment, voters consider protecting
air, land and water a primary factor in how they vote.
The League of Conservation Voters Education Fund is a nonprofit,
nonpartisan 501(c)(3) organization dedicated to raising
awareness about environmental issues, increasing the capacity
and effectiveness of state and local environmental groups,
and encouraging citizens to participate in the democratic
process. For more information and detailed analysis of the
state and national polls, visit the LCV Education Fund Web
site at www.VoteEnvironment.org.
|